Reading articles it's so easy to see whether the writer has an agenda or are trying to smear or paint someone in a negative light. For those that cannot see that but are tantalised by the story one need to be patient since they too will eventually know what is already known for those that choose to see. Historically what has happened with very strong characters - strong in the sense that they will not hold back what they know innately to be true but has shared it for everyone else to see? Some has been burnt, some tortured, one was put on the cross, and for what? Telling the truth to a humanity that was not willing to listen at that time. In time people realised that what they brought was heavenly and divine and there to help humanity out of the age old suffering. So when Serge Benhayon right now in this day and age are doing the exact same thing are we going to listen or are we going to do it all over again? Well it seems that some will go the old familiar road but I for sure will not. David Leser just shows that he is one that chose to rubbish someone that he obviously can see are doing good and he even enjoyed the healing session he said himself but not the part about reincarnation. This is how it seems to be. We are willing to see what we want to see but not something that challenges us too much. I have no problem to see that what Serge presents is truth along with hundreds if not thousands more all over the world. Matts, Sweden
(Written as a response to an article David Leser wrote about Serge Benhayon in Sydney Morning Herald) See more: https://wordsonsergebenhayon.wordpress.com/2012/08/26/letter-to-the-smh-biased-account-in-the-da-vinci-mode-article/
0 Comments
This is a response I wrote after reading an article on a blog called "Words on Serge Benhayon" The article is called "The pain in doing good"
This is a very powerful and empowering article because it confirms what many of us can feel but maybe haven't been able to put words into. Like the author of this article I attended quite a few masses when I was younger but I could never really feel any form of love happening there. I know that what I felt inside was very precious and for me that was my connection with God but back then I didn't call it God so when I heard people speak about God and I couldn't feel any love in their words I started to question God and for quite a while I created an issue with the word God. The insidious thing is that when I started to question the word God I also started to question and leave my innate connection that I had with God. Now I'm claiming back back what I know God to be and as much as I can I love speaking about God because it's something that has never left me. I left it because I bought into others version of God even though there are only one true version. God is something that forever lives within us and is deeply connected with how we are and carry ourselves. The phrase that "We are all God's children" are for me very true and God does never leave us. We might leave this connection out of reaction when God is spoken about without love and I would say fair enough, but then we should all claim back what we know love to be and by that we will also claim back what God truly is. This will also put pressure on those speaking about God but are not really connected to what God truly means. Talking about God is one thing - living with God is what counts. One of the most beautiful things I know is when a woman is in real contentment with her self. It’s like there is nothing else that needs to be added. It’s all complete. The other day I went to the supermarket and the woman behind the counter smiled at me and felt just like that. At ease with herself, and I realised how at ease with my self that made me feel, and also how that’s how it should be. Unfortunately that is not always what I see in society, which is a shame. I feel women should be allowed to enjoy themselves abundantly without having the pressure from the outside world to be anything other than who they are. Why? Because it feels great to meet a woman that can allow herself that grace and beauty and also it makes everyone else at ease as well, so everyone wins out. So why then is this not everyday life? Who prospers on women thinking they have to be something else than their natural self? Do they not feel worthy enough to claim that fact? I’m thinking that if women just accepted the fact that they are enough as it is there would be no room for any outside influence. Rather they would influence the world to change to be part of what they bring. I feel we need this and it would heal the world profoundly on so many levels.
|
Matts JosefssonHere I will write about things I find interesting and relevant Archives
December 2016
Categories |