Reading articles it's so easy to see whether the writer has an agenda or are trying to smear or paint someone in a negative light. For those that cannot see that but are tantalised by the story one need to be patient since they too will eventually know what is already known for those that choose to see. Historically what has happened with very strong characters - strong in the sense that they will not hold back what they know innately to be true but has shared it for everyone else to see? Some has been burnt, some tortured, one was put on the cross, and for what? Telling the truth to a humanity that was not willing to listen at that time. In time people realised that what they brought was heavenly and divine and there to help humanity out of the age old suffering. So when Serge Benhayon right now in this day and age are doing the exact same thing are we going to listen or are we going to do it all over again? Well it seems that some will go the old familiar road but I for sure will not. David Leser just shows that he is one that chose to rubbish someone that he obviously can see are doing good and he even enjoyed the healing session he said himself but not the part about reincarnation. This is how it seems to be. We are willing to see what we want to see but not something that challenges us too much. I have no problem to see that what Serge presents is truth along with hundreds if not thousands more all over the world. Matts, Sweden
(Written as a response to an article David Leser wrote about Serge Benhayon in Sydney Morning Herald) See more: https://wordsonsergebenhayon.wordpress.com/2012/08/26/letter-to-the-smh-biased-account-in-the-da-vinci-mode-article/
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Matts JosefssonHere I will write about things I find interesting and relevant Archives
December 2016
Categories |